Comments for NotImplementedException

Comment on ‘Interesting’ UAC prompts. by Nose hair trimmers

Nose hair trimmers — Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:06:37 +0000

Symantec does have a vested interest here – the company plans to sell products that smooth out UAC’s alleged faults – but the company’s findings could be evidence of spell additional headaches for system administrators considering Vista.

Comment on ‘Interesting’ UAC prompts. by Ann Chery

Ann Chery — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:23:36 +0000

I don’t think there’s a way to prevent the injection of rootkits. If someone authorizes the installation of software that also brings a rootkit along with it, the authorization is there.

Comment on A Spinner Control in C# by cubrikaska

cubrikaska — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:38:09 +0000

Dudo de esto.

Comment on A Spinner Control in C# by Gary

Gary — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:31:49 +0000

The source code uses GDI +, to make the control. It is the right decision.
I think the right decision, I like how the ’spinners’ across segments.

Comment on A Spinner Control in C# by Rob

Rob — Sun, 05 Apr 2009 19:22:41 +0000

‘Spinners’ is used as needed. If you do not have time for what a challenge it is simplifying your actions. They also appear in web browsers although often with a different look.

Comment on A Spinner Control in C# by Phillipp

Phillipp — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:28:28 +0000

Thanks for the link with the code. Very useful for me.

Comment on A Spinner Control in C# by Adam

Adam — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:07:59 +0000

They’re commonly used in place of progress bars, where you have a task that takes an amount of time, but you don’t have a way of accurately representing your progress through that task. You see them a lot in SQL Server Management studio… that’s what this example is based on. They also appear in web browsers and a lot of web sites although often with a different look.

Comment on A Spinner Control in C# by Zara

Zara — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:21:55 +0000

Sorry, but I don’t understand why you need those ’spinners’, so maybe I am not high-skilled in this field, but it is just very interesting for me, so please give me more information about it, looking forward to your answer, thanks in advance.

Comment on Using in-line delegates for logging by silky

silky — Fri, 30 May 2008 23:48:55 +0000

well in that case; nice

Comment on Using in-line delegates for logging by Adam

Adam — Thu, 29 May 2008 15:10:57 +0000

The cost of creating the delegate is at compile time. Think of the delegate as a function pointer. If the delegate is not called then there is no run-time cost associated with it. I’m not sure exactly what the MSIL looks like, but I have profiled this approach and it’s as good as putting an if block around each log line. The synatx gets a little neater when using a lambda expression in C# 3.0 instead of the delegate syntax – but this is just further syntax sugar, and not always possible if many lines of code are required.